Tuesday 29 December 2015

An appreciation of Colin Wilson

Colin Wilson’s work as a whole has had a significant influence upon me.

By happy accident I first came to Wilson’s work via his first book the Outsider.  I suspect a friend recommended it to me. Not long before the world of literature had opened up to me with a great sense of excitement. Wilson’s book surveyed an interesting cross section of writers and he wrote with a sense of urgency and engagement. This book was warmly received upon it’s initial publication and shot Wilson to literary Superstardom for a short period, By the time his second book appeared “Religion and the Rebel” a critical reversal had taken place and from this time on he was critical unfashionable. But wilson did not fade away instead he became a literary workhorse producing an astonishing number of books on a variety of subjects but all with a pretty consistent world view.

The Outsider looks at the development of the Outsider figure in literature, a figure that is marginal to the general thrust of humanity, lurking in the margins, feeling a sense of independence and alienation and regarding themself as self invented.

A lot of the literature at the time Wilson wrote the Outsider was pretty pessimistic and Wilson dwelt on the rather romantic artist who had high hopes and expectations which the drab mundaneness of life would crush. The beautiful vision at night is followed by the dull reality of the despairing morning after.  Such modern misanthropists as Samuel Beckett, Franz Kafka, Graham Greene and Joseph Conrad. All paint the absurd stupidity of human existence.

But Wilson was an optimist and instead of trusting the despairing morning after he trusted those moments where our spirit is lifted and we seem to see more, a birds eye view. From an information point of view we would trust a theory that is supported by greater information so likewise he trusts more those moments when we see more.

An artist like Herman Hesse whom Wilson played a part in introducing to the English public and William Blake both have a strong sense of vision and please Wilson more.

The Outsider was a good start to his career. It showed Wilson as a synthesiser of ideas, he read voluminously and he found the world of ideas his natural place of play. I haven’t read all of his books and don’t intend to but I am going to cover some books I consider important. I am uninterested however on his writings on crime and sexual deviance which may be of interest to others.

I should also mention that wilson was right from the start happy to declare himself a genius, some critics have made fun of this and while personally I don’t think he is, I  do think he is  probably less egotistical than many with ostensibly humbler views of their own talents, he was approachable and open and his views are generally pretty broad.

Significantly later than The Outsider Wilson wrote a best seller called “the Occult” it may have sealed his doom amongst the literary progressives. It was a considerable boost to his professional livelihood and also a significant development of his thought. I suspect it may have had a significant cultural impact, I certainly hope so.

With the Occult Wilson fearlessly sailed the seas of jeopardy. He happily, calmly, level heatedly surveyed ideas that were beyond the pale of polite academic discourse: ghosts, telepathy, magic, poltergeists, possession, telekensesis and fairies. For those who read the book though he showed that these subjects could be worthy of our interest and could say something about human capability. This was also a large book and the size reflects the scale of the reading that Wilson drew on. 

With this book the reader who is carried by Wilson’s arguments comes away with a sense of the scope of the human mind or spirit that is usually only barely tapped, he gives a sense of spiritual growth through personal effort as though at this time in our culture human Beings have the opportunity to enter into evolution consciously.

What this book did for me was to give a wide survey of "the paranormal" and shows how it is in fact much more common and "normal" than we have been led to believe but also show how optimistic heightened states of awareness that every healthy person experiences can lead to much greater things. Wilson’s book Beyond the Occult is a very worthy sequel.

The Craft of the Novel

What I found interesting about this book is Wilson’s perspective on what he thought the creation of the novel did. He argues that the invention of the novel freed humanity from a lot of the Dullness of Human life, Wilson credits Samuel Richardson with his novel Pamela as the inventor of the Novel and he writes:

From the perspective of the twentieth century, we can see that even Richardson’s greatest admirers failed to grasp the extra-ordinary nature of his achievement. Dr Johnson had the warmest regard for Richardson, but if anyone had told him the retired printer was one of the greatest innovators in literary history, he would have dismissed it with one of his bear-like growls. (‘Your feeling does you more credit than your intelligence, sir.’) Today, we can see that what made Richardson so remarkable was not that he enlarged our knowledge of human nature-—he didn’t—but that he freed the human imagination.

I think part of why I find this so interesting is the idea that human consciousness changes over time, the works of Homer and  Virgil do not have the individual interiority of Richardson’s novel. Although personally I think Shakespeare is the beginning of this sense of individual interiority, Harold Bloom writes about this in his book Shakespeare: the Invention of the Human.

The other reason that this book had such a big effect on me is that he gave this amazing introduction to a very neglected novelist John Cowper Powys which led me on to reading Powys’ monumental works and i still think wilson’s summary is one of the best appreciations of Powys’ over looked novel a Glastonbury Romance:

Powys is a mystic, and the first thing to note about the book is that it appeared when he was sixty. This kind of vision could not have been achieved by a young man; the young tend to be trapped in immediacy. In the course of his six decades, much of which had been spent lecturing in America, Powys had developed an increasing sense of the oneness of man and nature. He would not have been in the least surprised by the discovery made by the experimenter Cleve Backster that plants can apparently read our minds; in Powys, trees, grass, even rocks, possess their own strange, dim consciousness. Human beings alone are cut off from this universal consciousness by their narrow, intense perceptions, although Powys prophesies that this will cease to be so, that there will soon be a ‘catastrophic change in human psychology itself’ which will cause certain human beings to experience a sense of oneness with the ‘subhuman organisms in nature’. Powys fills his enormous canvas——the book is nearly twelve hundred pages long——with an almost Shakespearian panorama of humanity. But no matter how absorbed we become in these human beings, we remain aware of the vast, overarching nature above them.

It is sometime since I have read Wilson’s Craft of the Novel and I am sure there is much more that others could find in it.

So far all the books I have mentioned have been non fiction or critical works even though they sit outside the usual framework of literary criticism. But Wilson has also written a large number of Novels it is mainly his science fiction or Lovecraftian inspired works that i want to talk about, but all his novels have something of value in them. They are all novels of ideas and Wilson is able to dramatise ideas in a really engaging way.

The Novels I mean are the SpiderWorld tetralogy, The Mind parasite , The Philosopher’s Stone and The Space Vampires. All of these novels have an amazing sense of people being challenged to rise to new heights drawing upon powers that are latent in all of us and moving towards a better world where we can access this rich inner world. The spider world novels also have a great outward invention and take place in a richly imagined environment.

That’s all I am going to say about them, but Wilson does manage to show that he thinks a good novel should be filled with optimism and expand the reader’s horizons and sense of possibility and that the the life of the mind is rewarding and challenging. I thoroughly enjoyed reading these works and have read most of them multiple times.

From Atlantis to the Sphinx

Wilson was writing this book as Graham Hancock was writing his important book Fingerprints of the Gods which Wilson book, drew upon he saw a draft i think prior to publication, the two became friends they are both iconoclasts. the idea central to these books is that there is a whole chapter of human civilisation that isn’t in our history books. There was a high human and globel culture that existed over 12,000 years ago. The Egyptian and Mayan cultures were child civilisations of the older one, this is the idea we know of Plato’s story of lost Atlantis. This civilisation was wiped out by a global cataclysmic along with a large number of species.

I think they are correct about this, it isn’t academically mainstream but more evidence is coming to support it. What Wilson’s book does more than Hancock’s, although it is actually one of Hancock’s interests, is to ask “What difference does it make if human cultural history is much longer?” his answer is that we can see a broader view of humanity, that culture isn’t just a linear projection but can include falls and set backs, things we once knew we may not know now there can be other and quite legitimate ways of seeing the world.  

Wilson writes:

 if we are talking about a different knowledge system, a system that is as valid as our own and yet unthinkably different in approach, then it could be of unimaginable importance. The kind of knowledge possessed by modern man is essentially fragmented. If some future visitors from outer space landed on earth, and found vast empty cities full of libraries and museums and planetariums, they would conclude that men of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries must have been intellectual giants. But as their scholars studied our encyclopaedias of science and philosophy and technology and every other conceivable subject, they would quickly recognise that no single mind could even begin to grasp what it was all about. We have no essential knowledge system - no way of seeing the universe as a whole and making sense of it.

once again Wilson has written a very enjoyable book, I think Hancock should be given the nod as the ground breaker, but wilson was there with him and offered a different and complimentary view.

Alien Dawn

I did feel some trepidation approaching this book, i thought wow has Wilson dived into the full kookiness of UFOs? But I was interested to see what he did with it. Wilson doesn’t investigate cases, what he does is asks a good friend who owns a bookstore that specialised in UFO books to load him up with good ones and he reads voluminously and synthesises what he reads.

Now for the most part what we have have is witnessed phenomena that can’t be reproduced in a laboratory, so we can’t do experiments about it as you can with telepathy for instances. There has been some analysis of physical effects but for the most part it is witnessed phenomena and so we need to evaluate the credibility of the witness, the number of witnesses the consistency of experience described and try to make some provisional observations.

Wilson Aligns himself more with Jacguee Valee and Carl Jung interpretation he thinks yes there is validity in these experiences.

Generally we tend to think of UFO phenomena as modern but Valee sees it as a continuation of a lot of phenomena that was regarded as fairie. And when we think of Fairie we tend to think of cute little things with wings but fairie phenomena was actually serious , interaction with Fairiecould have very serious experiences of time disjunctions, a short time with fairies and you find upon your return hundred’s of years have passed and everyone you knew is dead. Modern UFO phenomena the time disjunctions don’t appear as great & possibly it is due to an evolution in the phenomena.

Wilson is exploring UFOs from the standpoint that Consciousness is central. This follows the modern idea the the world looks more like a giant thought than a giant machine. We accept as reality what is actually only a small portion that our senses and limited consciousness allow us. The UFO phenomena is something from outside of that everyday limited reality that intersects with it and shows us a glimpse of a different vista.  People may see this as ‘merely’ psychological but instead it is an acceptance that our consciousness is not somehow distinct and separate from reality.

In the chapter Alien powers Wilson writes:

For ten years or so after Arnold’s sighting in 1947, the main question was whether flying saucers came from our solar system or another galaxy. By the 1960s it was clear that this was the wrong question, and that the entities behind the UFO phenomenon did not appear to share our limitations in space and time. Vallee pointed out that they seem to behave like creatures out of folklore, Keel that the phenomena resemble those investigated by the Society for Psychical Research in the nineteenth century. Abductions and crop circles did nothing to clarify the issue, except to make us aware that we seemed to be dealing with beings whose powers were far greater than our own. Their ability to manipulate human beings, to take over our lives, control our minds and monitor our thoughts, seemed designed to make it clear that our notion that we are the most intelligent life form on Earth needs some serious revision. 

Yet the work of Robert Monroe makes it clear that we are seeing only part of the picture. If his experiences are to be taken seriously, then there is something fundamentally wrong with the way we view ourselves. If we truly understood ourselves, we might have far less reason for feeling inferior to these beings. Monroe’s ability to leave his  body strikes us as literally superhuman. The same is true of David Morehouse’s powers of remote viewing. Yet it seems that Morehouse is only one of a team who can all do it

Dreaming to Some Purpose

This book is a very candid overview of his life and work. It can be useful as a guide to which of his works will interest you. This book is a great testament to Wilson’s tenacity. Frustratingly I also discovered that there is an unpublished novel, Metamorphosis of a Vampire which i’d love to read.

I am aware that such a pithy summary of Wilson’s work will never give a proper impression of his work especially when he confronts so many controversial subjects, there is no substitute for actually reading him.

So once again thank you Mr Wilson your work has made a difference to me and I think there is much from your work that could still benefit humanity as a whole.


There are other worthy Wilson books you can read , these are the one’s that stand out for me.

Wednesday 5 August 2015

The Spiritual World View Continued

This blog is culled from a number of posts I made on a message board. The discussion started with the contention "that truth is no longer a simple place but a vanishing concept." In answering this I went back to first principles and my response may seem rather tangential to the starting question. I decided to edit my responses into a single blog which I have put here. It had a rather piecemeal construction, but hopefully it flows OK.

..........             ...............              ..............           ................           ..............        ..............         .............

In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth. Or the big bang was the beginning of both time and space, the world of relativity came from the absolute unconditioned by time and space. We have a dual nature of relativity and absolute. As we approach God we move towards the absolute, which is Truth. Maybe our earthly minds will grow to be able to express the Kingdom of God here on earth. There is real meaning to be found.

There is absolute Truth (singular). There are in religion often certain codified beliefs or religious prescription each of these can be closer or further away from Truth, they aren't simply all just relative. I think in pretty much all human thought or at least it's expression in language there is a fair dose of relativity, in Pre Modern thought the Earth was seen as the sub lunar realm a realm of mutability and change. Our consciousness is like various wattage light bulbs through which differing amounts of the divine current can flow through. 

God is Being (Omnipresent), Consciousness (Omniscient) and Bliss (All Loving) and can be experienced but not fully expressed in earthly language. Our everyday mind is a partial mind, we can be rational but our everyday thoughts are not sufficient to climb the ladder of Truth. Truth like the physical world can be experienced and that experience can be expressed cogently (but not fully) in rational discourse. A Commonality across those who have near death experiences is the greater sense of reality and consciousness of the experiences, they directly experience a greater mindfulness than they had in their earthly experiences. These experiences remain crystal clear to them over spans of decades, when memories and dreams become dim. 

I don't think there is a fundamental conflict between religion and science, Truth is one, too often the debate has been falsely framed as between reason and faith. Science is a method of enquiry, mainly into the external world, so far it has had little to nothing that it can say regarding the essential and fundamental invisibilities of human existence Consciousness and Love. All science rests on a base of Consciousness, how can there be scientific enquiry or any kind of inquiry without consciousness? if a scientific philosophy then tries to undermine that and argue consciousness is an illusion, as it sometimes does, it is cutting off its own base.

That there is such a thing as absolute truth is not the same thing as saying there is certainty. 

There are two basic paradigms Material and Divine. I find the later more cogent in explaining experience, I've mentioned problems with consciousness, also Materialism is based on upwards causality yet our experience is that our actions are ruled by our consciousness (downward causality) and every sane person acts as though they are responsible for their decisions. So materialists in one sense believe in upward causality but they can’t live by it, the Divine view is consistent and doesn’t hold this contradiction.

Materialism posits that matter through a mindless process builds life, meaning is like some kind of accidental secretion, from such a world view where there is no objective basis for meaning, reason and truth. A society that holds such views will have meaning, reason and justice seep out of social discourse. 

Materialism is overtly a philosophy of nihilism. If further it posits that human beings developed from the underlying principle of "survival of the fittest" then no matter what gloss you try to put on it you're saying fundamentally 'might is right”.

Life does seem to have evolved on earth, with simple life forms being followed by more complex forms, I see this as a mindful unfolding of consciousness over time. 

We find in modern physics that the observer (consciousness) is intertwined with matter and effects the outcome of subatomic experiments.

If at the sub atomic level matter intersects with mind, then Consciousness exists in some level throughout matter. At the mineral level it's very latent, in plants and micro organisms it shows a greater expression and is capable of showing pain responses (and most likely pleasure). Then you move up the animal kingdom with greater levels of consciousness, human beings have the greatest level of consciousness in the animal kingdom. All of this Consciousness is sparks of the divine consciousness. I think consciousness is going to continue emerging in this world and that it extends beyond it, as has been experienced by people in Near Death and Mystical Experiences. I don't think Consciousness is static in any of us, there are times when we seem to see with a wider view and we experience a feeling of "all being well" in such states the things we do all seem to go right and we feel a great sense of identity with everything around us.



Friday 30 January 2015

New Zealand's Cultural Life


When I started this blog, I wanted to do my first blog on spirituality and culture and maybe that'll come or maybe it will forever be my 'next' blog. Instead i did a blog on spirituality because i felt like I'd need to have some definition around that first. So this blog I thought I'd do focus on the cultural strand of that initial thought,  there have also been three things lately that have all brought me to think of New Zealand culture. 

I was chatting with an American friend Rich Goodhart about the popular music we grew up with on the radio through the 60's & 70's and he told of wonderful experiences of hearing this great popular music come over the radio, great Beatles songs, Doors etc and I thought of the terrible pap that came over the radio waves in New Zealand. The next thing was the New Zealand writer Eleanor Catton making critical comments about New Zealand culture and politics and the media frenzy that ensued. The last thing was John Cleese and Eric Idle talking about doing a tour of New Zealand in the 60's and what a truly strange and dreadful place they found it.

I have slowly built some interest in my family ancestry, my great great grandfather Thomas Bevan wrote a memoir Reminiscence of an Old Colonist which I found fascinating and there is plenty to be fascinated by in the relatively short human history of this country, but what had happened by the late 1950's and early 1960's that it had become such a cultural desert? It seems like there was a very strong inclination to conformity and due to distances and media isolation New Zealand was a cultural backwater. 

Novels, poems, plays, movies and music are all our spiritual food. In New Zealand we always seem to be on the cusp of or to have just found our cultural identity. In music there were those 50's & 60's rocker: Ray Columbus, Max Merrit, The La de Da's, The Avengers, The Fourmyula et al. The Seventies and 80's Split Enz, Dragon, Space Waltz, The Herbs, Dave Dobbyn, Netherworld Dancing Toys, Flying Nun bands were greeted with great delight in the acclamation that the New Zealand scene had coming of age. Eric idle spoke of the amazing change that swept through the UK with the coming of the Beatles and the stuffiness that they swept aside almost over night. But to me New Zealand music generally didn't have that kind of cultural penetration, certainly not the Flying Nun bands. Split Enz's True Colours going to number one and keeping Pink Floyd's The Wall out of the number one spot to me was a more significant National Cultural event, that I suspect the Enz were only able to achieve by being based overseas. 

Personally I'm Ok with the fact that we can feel a warm sense of nostalgic cultural identity when we hear well known tracks from the "Nature's Best" compilations on our radio, although I still think that sense of being on the cusp of gaining a cultural identity is still there, I don't think Lorde will break us through. When I want some New Zealand music I tend to turn to the various permutations of the Finn brothers or My greatest hits CD of Daphne Walker, my favourite artists are not Kiwis, why is that? Do I have cultural cringe? or is it that New Zealand is just always going to be a small part of the greater cultural landscape?

Having art that inspires your internal life recognised in the national cultural life I think makes the individual feel a connection between the inner life and the more external shared cultural life. I didn't really have that sense not connecting with the cultural fodder leaking from New Zealand Radios as I was growing up.

Elanor Catton has caused a bit of a stir by talking of cultural and political issues in New Zealand saying:


"At the moment, New Zealand, like Australia and Canada, (are dominated by) these neo-liberal, profit-obsessed, very shallow, very money-hungry politicians who do not care about culture.
They care about short-term gains. They would destroy the planet in order to be able to have the life they want."

I might come at this slightly differently but in essence I agree with what she is saying to me the reaction seems to speak more loudly than her words, you can get a taste of it in this New Zealand Herald article:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11394346

Gordon Campbell also wrote about it here:

http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2015/01/29/gordon-campbell-on-the-eleanor-catton-rumpus/

I admit I haven't read Eleanor's novel, I think this controversy will inspire me to do so. I probably read less New Zealand literature than I listen to our music, I read quite a bit of Frame and Ronald Hugh Morrison and other odds and ends. Eleanor I think expresses most people's opinions of New Zealand literature:

"I, for example, grew up just having a strange belief that New Zealand writers were automatically less great than writers from Britain and America, for example. Because we were some colonial backwater ..."

I think the last two New Zealand books I read were Tim Hanna's books on Kim Newcombe and John Britton both amazing practitioners in the art of motorcycle design and construction for racing.  They were to me steeped in New Zealand culture. I have a brother who does amazing feats of engineering in his garage and that image of the garage problem solver holds an incredible romance for me. It's kind of funny because I'm not at all a petrol head and don't even drive. (Yeah we need to get off oil and move to electricity, go Tesla Motors!)

Maybe as Kiwi's we just need to become comfortable with always being perched on the brink of cultural discovery.





Sunday 11 January 2015

Spiritual World View, starting at the Centre

This is my new blog covering everything not covered in my music Blog "Music from under My Skin" it'll cover subjects like: Spirituality, Religion, Art, Culture & politics. Both blogs are to explore the land of heart's desire I need to set the tone so the first blog is on the spiritual world view, that is the view that we are spiritual beings having a human experience, that consciousness and love is at the centre of what we are.  

In 20th/21st Century intellectual culture Atheism of a reductionist materialist kind is the ruling paradigm, it is the expected faith of most scientists (even if it isn't their faith) so it has a social weight, a gravitas, an influence upon our society and culture, but I think it is mistaken and it is time to move on. 

I think we have a spirit that survives the body. Why?:

All enquiry rises from our consciousness it is the only thing that we can be positive exists, it is our direct experience, even the external world is a supposition, although a pretty good one due to it’s consistency. So our consciousness is all we can be certain of, an argument that ends by denying or devaluing consciousness strikes me as undermining the foundation upon which it was built. In materialist philosophy consciousness is called “the hard problem” because it shouldn’t exist. Consciousness shouldn't exist because materialism supposes that matter is without consciousness and human beings are determined wholly by our material make up, so how can consciousness emerge from these determinist unconscious elements.

If consciousness is a byproduct of the chemistry of the brain then that implies that all causality is essentially upwards, that is our brain chemistry produces our thoughts. This directly contradicts how we generally appreciate our actions, that is that they follow our thoughts. I don’t think anyone that follows materialism actually acts in accordance with this supposition, people act on the assumption that we are responsible for our own actions. Thus I think reductionist materialism fails the utility test.

Nearly everyone has had experiences where consciousness seems to act at a distance (this can’t happen if consciousness is a localised phenomena inside our heads as posited by materialism). Two common experiences are the sense of being stared at and knowing who is calling you before you answer the phone. The sense off being stared at, is the experience of feeling that someone is looking at you and then turning around to see that they are (this experience is more common among woman than men). The flip side of this experience is staring at someone and having them turn around to look at you (more common for men than women). Knowing who is calling you on the phone or thinking of someone you haven't seen in years and they call you are experiences that everyone has had and imply telepathy. Materialists will say these are just due to chance, but it is a testable and thus falsifiable theory (probably the main feature of a scientific theory). Rupert Sheldrake (and others) have done studies, one of which was getting four people to ring someone they knew, one of the 4 is selected at random, and the person had to guess who was calling before they answered the phone. Chance alone over an extended period would have the results at 25% but instead they averaged 40%, given the size of the tests was a hugely significant result, massively improbable to attribute to chance. What is more these tests weren’t using psychically gifted subjects but just regular folks, this paranormal phenomena is actually normal.

Millions of people have experienced directly leaving their bodies in either out of Body experiences, near death experiences and shared death experiences. In NDEs the persons body will be in a coma and sometimes as close as it is possible to get to brain death and yet come back, but they can see, hear and feel what is going on accurately usually from above their body. They also move into spiritual landscapes and their sense is of a heightened reality, normal waking consciousness compares to this heightened as sleep to waking, it is that profoundly richer and more real. These experiences have a profound effect on the person having them and lead to them losing their fear of death. They are entirely convincing to the person having them. There have been extensive studies done on these experiences and to me the simplest explanation is that they are just what they appear to be.

Lastly the materialist philosophy seems predicated on Newtonian physics with it’s solid billiard ball atoms and the machine model for the universe (note Newton himself was not a reductionist materialist but a dualist). Modern physics is much odder, where the act of witnessing (consciousness) turns a probability wave into a particle, where quantum entanglement has instant (faster than light speed) interaction between particles and where energy and matter are interchangeable qualities. As has been famously summarised the universe starts to look more like a giant thought than a giant machine.

What difference does it make?

Well for people coming back from near death experiences, their lives are transformed, almost turned upside down, the truth's of the heart become the centre of who they are, if you don't fear death other fears diminish too. If your intellect supports rather than questions those moments when you feel joy and everything falls into place then that joy is likely to come through more often and infiltrate the entire psyche. To me it is a much better paradigm for art, art can actually help us towards the reality of the spirit it is not a pleasant diversion from more serious matters like politics and commerce.

Time to put this first little credo out from my head and out for my handful of readers

Links

Chris Carter on Science and Psychic Phenomena:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07BM3fASJG4

Rupert Sheldrake, who has written on the sense of being stared at and dogs who know when their owners are coming home as well as on other issues of spirit and biology:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKHUaNAxsTg

Some excellent Near Death Experiences: